Sep 29, 2008, 01:48 AM // 01:48
|
#21
|
Wilds Pathfinder
|
So the only viable paragon build in pve is to use a lame "imbagon" skills with powerful pve-only skills? Ya can you honestly name one build that doesn't use pve-only skills thats still affective.
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2008, 02:07 AM // 02:07
|
#22
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: standing on your last control point, while the rest of your team is to busy killing mine
Guild: The Luminaries [Lumi]
Profession: A/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sniper22
So the only viable paragon build in pve is to use a lame "imbagon" skills with powerful pve-only skills? Ya can you honestly name one build that doesn't use pve-only skills thats still affective.
|
http://www.pvxwiki.com/wiki/Build:P/...ing_Strike_PvE
http://www.pvxwiki.com/wiki/Build:P/...cation_Paragon
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2008, 03:26 AM // 03:26
|
#23
|
Grotto Attendant
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rumensechkov
My suggestion is finding a way to make the Paragon a more playable primary profession. This can be achieved by making it's primary attribute more useful and the skills linked to it more powerful.
|
Leadership is already insane energy management.
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2008, 03:35 AM // 03:35
|
#24
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne
|
What a stupid thread. Is there any point to Sardelac any more? It only gets abused by bad trolls or spammed with dumb suggestions.
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2008, 03:44 AM // 03:44
|
#25
|
Wilds Pathfinder
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamingMetroid
|
Oh ya, but isn't it funny how the only thing that people really mention is the imbagon? Yes I see pvx has other builds, but people only want imbagons. I'm sure though that there are plenty of areas where paragons could get a buff at least in pve.
Maybe this is a dumb suggestion, but you may be able to overcome the long recharge times of some paragon chants with assassins promise in pve.
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2008, 03:50 AM // 03:50
|
#26
|
Teenager with attitude
Join Date: Jul 2005
Guild: Fifteen Over Fifty [Rare]
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sniper22
Oh ya, but isn't it funny how the only thing that people really mention is the imbagon? Yes I see pvx has other builds, but people only want imbagons.
|
Why would a group want a build without overpowered PvE skills? It's the same for every profession.
__________________
People are stupid.
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2008, 05:16 AM // 05:16
|
#27
|
Banned
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamingMetroid
Paragons don't need to be made more powerful just because they aren't popular, that's a horrible way to balance a game.
And about paragons not having skills that let them farm easily, skills in GW should be made for use in PvP and that's it. If by some chance you can use a certain skill combo to farm things, that's great, but it doesn't mean other classes need farming specific skills.
|
Paragons are hardly unpopular.
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2008, 05:30 AM // 05:30
|
#28
|
Jungle Guide
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arduinna
There's nothing wrong with a complex profession. (hi Mesmer).
|
Bad example is.... really bad
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2008, 07:55 AM // 07:55
|
#29
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In your cupboard *nomming* your cookies
Guild: Blade of Souls
Profession: P/W
|
/not signed...
I main a para, it is horribly unbalanced, and way overpowered..
When I am looking for a party in any HM area, I just post Imba lfg whatever and see invites flying all around the place...
I've done FoW, UW, DOA, Deep, Urgoz, all on my para, pugged... so even when not organized by guildies it is very possible to get into a group..
Other then that, your farming point is valid in one way, it's true they cannot farm anything. BUT there are plenty of viable options to farm with other profs.. make one and move on
More armor or even more buffs would make the para even more unbalanced.
And to quote the wise Alf:
"If you don't see Paragons in PvE it's because they're too bussy doing everything in the game H/H because Paras don't need a human team at all, ever. Kinda hard to fail being one y'know."
This is the most true thing I heard over the last couple of days :P
/not signed once more
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2008, 08:05 AM // 08:05
|
#30
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: a van down by the river
Guild: iBench
Profession: P/W
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshuarodger
are you kidding? they're called IMBAGONS for a reason. if i had one in every party i was in, i'd be a happy monk... or a bored one. also i don't see many /P's running around outside of warriors, because they aren't a "great" secondary profession. there are very few "great" secondaries and paragon falls into that "not great" category. it's an extremely useful primary profession in any party if the user knows how to play it properly. i suggest you read over the paragon forum a little more because if you're having trouble playing this prof, you're doing something wrong.
|
Properly play it? Is this a joke!? Gon is my main profession and has been for quite some time.
Here is your instructions:
1. Cast AR
2. Throw Spear
3. Build Adren
4. Use Shouts When Full
5. Rinse and Repeat
As for other builds. I run a few others mainly [Cruel Spear] and [Empathic Removal] setups.
pink
Last edited by Mr Pink57; Sep 29, 2008 at 08:08 AM // 08:08..
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2008, 11:46 PM // 23:46
|
#31
|
Forge Runner
|
I think that paragon is good enough.
You might see it as "unpopular" because you see them as often as assassins, ritualist, and dervishes.
Why is that? Because the six core classes are on every game and therefore there are many more of them.
In the end, /notsigned.
I cannot agree with your statements.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:49 PM // 13:49.
|